Employees’ perception of knowledge management in academic libraries in the digital age
AbstractThe 21st century is associated with change in the business, education, and information environments due to the digital age paradigm shift. In the digital age, knowledge management has become essential for academic libraries that want to accelerate their performance in this time of change. The research objective was to evaluate academic library employees’ perceptions of knowledge management in the digital age. The research was guided by pragmatism through incorporating the mixed methods research approach where qualitative and quantitative methods were applied to ensure that the research questions were addressed. The research strategy was a case study. The study collected empirical data on cases of four campus libraries. This study applied the exploratory method to evaluate employees’ perceptions on knowledge management roles, skills, and technologies. Interviews and a survey were used as data collection methods. A purposive sample of the library management team and library employees from a South African higher education institution was carried out. The reliability of the questionnaire was tested that showed a high Cronbach’s alpha. The findings produced employees’ radar maps and concluded that knowledge management is not something to be neglected in the digital age that is associated with continuous change primarily because it ensures that knowledge is created, shared, retained, and disseminated in the library. Librarians are encouraged to use technologies such as social media, big data, and virtual reality in their day-to-day work to sustain the library’s relevance in the digital age.
Akosile, A. & Olatokun, W. 2019. Factors influencing knowledge sharing among academics in Bowen University, Nigeria. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(2):410-427.
Agresti, W.W. 2000. Knowledge management. Advances in Computers, Vol 53: 171-283.
Allison, D.E. 2013. The patron-driven library: a practical guide for managing collections and services in the digital age. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Barlow, A. & Bocko, A. 2020. Working outside the lines: A case for knowledge exchange in the academic library. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, Vol 32(2): 87-93, https://10.1080/1941126X.2020.1739819
Bawack R. 2020. Implementing knowledge management in academic libraries in Cameroon: A librarian’s perception. Journal of Knowledge Management Application and Practice, Vol 2(2):67-82.
Bosch, S., Albee, B. & Romaine, S. 2021. The new abnormal. Library Journal, Vol 146(4): 20-25.
Botha, A., Kourie, D & Snyman, R. 2008. Coping with continuous change in the business environment: Knowledge management and knowledge management technology. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Brajer-Marczak, R. 2016. Elements of knowledge management in the improvement of business processes. Management, Vol 20(2): 242-260.
Breeding, M. 2021. Library systems report: Advancing library technologies in challenging times. American Libraries, Vol 52(5): 22-33.
Ceptureanu, E.G., Ceptureanu, S.I., Popescu, D.I. & Vlad, L.B. 2017. Two stage analysis of successful change implementation of knowledge management strategies in energy companies from Romania. Energies, Vol 10: 1-17, doi:10.3390/en10121965
Ceptureanu, S.I., Ceptureanu, E.G. & Tudorache, A. 2015. Considerations of managerial change in knowledge-based organisation. Review of International Comparative Management, Vol 16(4): 461-470.
Charlton, J. 2021. International report. Information Today, Vol 38(6): 26-27.
Charney, M. 2014. Academic librarians and the sustainability curriculum: Building alliances to support a paradigm shift. Collaborate Librarianship, 6(1):20-35.
Chigada, J. & Ngulube, P. 2016. A comparative analysis of knowledge retention strategies at selected banks in South Africa. Business Information Reviews, 33(4):221-227.
Collis, J. & Hussey, R. 2014. Business research: a practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Committee of Higher Education Libraries of South Africa (CHELSA). 2016. Strategic plans. Available from: http://www.chelsa.ac.za/sites/default/files/documents/Pateka%20draft%20input%20on%20CHELSA%20Research%20Support.pdf
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: SAGE.
Du Plessis, T. & Mabunda, T. 2016. Change management in an academic library in the knowledge economy. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, Vol 82(1): https://doi.org/10.7553/82-1-1596
Ebisi, E.M. & Arua, G.N. 2018. Knowledge management in libraries in the 21st Century. Information Impact: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, Vol 9(3): 72-83.
Elliott, A.C. & Woodward, W.A. 2007. Statistical analysis quick reference guidebook: with SPSS examples. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Enakrire, R.T. & Onyancha, O.B. 2020. Strategies and tools for knowledge management practices in selected academic libraries in Nigeria and South Africa. South African Journal of Information Management, Vol 22(1): a1159, https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/1159/1805
Farrell, M. 2017. Leadership Reflections. Journal of Library Administration, Vol 57: 674-682.
Johnson, A.J. 2018. Reliability, Cronbach’s Alpha. In, Allen, M. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Ketchum, A.M. 2017. The research life cycle and the health sciences librarian: responding to change in scholarly communication. Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol 105(1): 80-83.
Koloniari, M. & Fassoulis, K. 2017. Knowledge management perceptions in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol 43:135-142.
Kumar, M. (2009). Academic Libraries in Electronic Environment: Paradigm Shift. Available from: http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:YWu9FjQSq6sJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
Mavodza, J. & Ngulube, P. 2011a. Exploring the use of knowledge management practices in an academic library in a changing information environment. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol 77(1): https://doi.org/10.7553/77-1-63
Mavodza, J. & Ngulube, P. 2011b. The use of technology-based mechanisms and knowledge management techniques in library practices in an academic environment: A case study. Mousaion, Vol 29(2): 95-116.
Mavodza, J. & Ngulube, P. 2012. Knowledge management practices at an institution of higher learning. South African Journal of Information Management, Vol 14(1): #496, https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/496/583
Merat, A. & Bo, D. 2013. Strategic analysis of knowledge firms: The links between knowledge management and leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1):3-15.
Morehart, P. 2021. International innovators. American Libraries, Vol 52(7/8): 18-21.
Ngulube, P. & Ngulube, B. 2015. Mixed l in the South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences: An investigation of trends in the literature. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, Vol 18(1):1-13.
Nithya, N. & Anjani, P.K. 2021. Radar analysis (Competency Gap Analysis) – Analytical study of employees’ competency level. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, Vol 27(3): 441-447.
Pawlowsky, S. & Ryan, T.G. 2016. The 21st century school library: perpetual change or evolution? International Journal of Education Reform, Vol 25(1):38-55.
Raju, J. 2014. Knowledge and skills for the digital era academic library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40:163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.007
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. 2012. Research methods for business students. Harlow: Pearson.
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. 2013. Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Shupe, E.I. & Pung, S.K. 2011. Understanding the changing role of academic librarians from a psychological perspective: A literature review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol 37(5):409-415.
Stenius, M., Hankonen, N., Ravaja, N. & Haukkala, A. 2016. Why share expertise? A closer look at the quality of motivation to share or withhold knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 20(2):181-198.
Shohan, S. & Perry, M. 2009. Knowledge management as a mechanism for technological and organisational change management in Israeli universities. Higher Education, Vol 57:22-246.
Sukovic, S., Litting, D. & England, A. 2011. Playing with the future: Library engagement and change. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, Vol 42(2):70-87.
Swart, J., Kinnie, N., Van Rossenberg, Y. & Yalabik, Z.Y. 2014. Why should I share my knowledge? A multiple foci of commitment perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 24(3):269-289.
University of Johannesburg. 2018. UJ Fourth Industrial Revolution. Available from: https://www.uj.ac.za/fourth-industrial-revolution
Yin, R.K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Yin, R.K. 2012. Applications of case study research. London: SAGE.
Zelenkov, Y. 2016. Impact of knowledge management and change management on the effectiveness of the firm: Evidence from the Russian companies. Proceedings of the 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on the changing face of Knowledge Management Impacting Society. Available from: https://0-doi-org.ujlink.uj.ac.za/10.1145/2925995.2926037
Copyright (c) 2022 Tiyani Tyson Mabunda, Tanya Du Plessis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors (copyright owners) should be properly acknowledged when works are cited. Authors retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of Open Access.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License