Leisure reading: a case study of adolescent readers at Letlhabile community library
Abstract
Literature on the topic of reading habits shows that reading for leisure benefits children and adolescents in numerous ways. It improves their vocabulary and literacy skills, it encourages self-development andprovides young adults with entertainment, relaxation and a means to escape (McKool 2007: 111). The aim of this study was to investigate the reading habits of adolescents in Letlhabile in terms of practise and perception. The study used a mixed methods research approach and collected data from a total of 290 respondents with the aid of questionnaires and a focus group. The researchers wanted to establishhow adolescents in Letlhabile perceive leisure reading, to what extent they participate in reading for leisure, and how leisure reading can be promoted in this community. The data collected from the mixed methods approach revealed contradictory findings that a questionnaire alone would not have revealed. The research approach was thus successful, but the findings were not enough to explore and meet fully all the aims of the research. It was, however, found that respondents were aware of the benefits of leisure reading and that they had good ideas about how leisure reading could be promoted in their community.References
American Library Association. 2006. AASL position statement on the value of independent reading in the school library media program. [Online]. http://www.ala.org/aasl/advocacy/resources/statements/ind-reading (23 May 2015).
Beastall, L. 2006. Enchanting a disenchanted child: revolutionising the means of education using information and communication technology and e-learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(1): 97–110.
Brozo, W.G., Shiel, G. and Topping, K. 2007. Engagement in reading: lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4): 304–315.
Christensen, L.B., Johnson, B. and Turner, L.A. 2011. Research methods, design, and analysis. 12th edition. Boston: Pearson.
Clark, C. and Rumbold, K. 2006. Reading for pleasure: a research overview. London: National Literacy Trust.
Creswell, J.W. 2003. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Early, J. 2011. Leisure reading habits: students’ attitudes toward their in-school reading compared to out of school reading. Master’s thesis. St. John Fisher College.
Garro, L. 2014. The importance of reading fiction. Master’s thesis. University of Central Missouri.
Gilbert, G.N. Ed. 2008. Researching social life. 3rd edition. London: Sage.
Guthrie J.T., Morrison, D.A. and Klauda, S.L. 2012. Motivation, achievement and classroom contexts for information book reading. In Adolescents’ engagement in academic literacy. J.T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield and S.L. Klauda, Eds. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
Holden, J. 2004. Creative reading: young people, reading and public libraries. London: Demos.
Howard, V. 2011. The importance of pleasure reading in the lives of young teens: self-identification, self-construction and self-awareness. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 43(1): 46–55.
Howie, S., Venter, E. and Van Staden, S. 2008. The effect of multilingual policies on performance and progress in reading literacy in South African primary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(6): 551–560.
Hughes-Hassell, S. and Lutz, C. 2006. What do you want to tell us? A survey of the habits and attitudes of urban middle school students toward leisure reading. Young Adult Library Services, 39: 1–8.
Hughes-Hassell, S. and Rodge, P. 2007. The leisure reading habits of urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(1): 22–33.
Ibarra-Guyos, V.P. 2013. Antecedents of leisure reading. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 13(1): 1–11.
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J. and Turner, L. 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2): 112–133.
Krashen, S. and McQuillan, S. 2007. Early intervention at every age: the case for late intervention. There are effective late interventions – and one of them is free. Educational Leadership, 65(2): 68–73.
Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.A. 2001. Social analysis: selected tools and techniques. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Kutay, V. 2014. A survey of the reading habits of Turkish high school students and an examination of the efforts to encourage them to read. PhD thesis. Loughborough University.
Lategan, I.A.S. 1999. Guidelines for teaching of reading in the intermediate phase within the context of inclusion. PhD thesis. University of South Africa.
Mahwasane, N.P. 2008. Provision of library services to disadvantaged children in rural areas of the Limpopo province. Master’s thesis. University of South Africa.
Mathewson, G.C. 2004. Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In Theoretical models and processes of reading. R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau, Eds. Newark: International Reading Association. 1431–1461.
McClure, L.M. 2011. The interest of grade 10 learners in reading for leisure at two schools in western Johannesburg. Master’s thesis. University of Johannesburg.
McDougal, P. 2011. A survey and analysis of middle school student voluntary independent reading behaviors. PhD thesis. University of Oregon.
McKenna, M.C. 1994. Toward a model of reading attitude acquisition. In Fostering the love of reading: the affective domain in reading education. E.H. Cramer & M. Castle, Eds. Newark: International Reading Association.
McKenna, M.C., Conradie, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B.G. and Meyer, J.P. 2012. Reading attitudes of middle school students: results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3): 283–306.
McKool, S.S. 2007. Factors that influence the decision to read: an investigation of fifth grade students’ out-of-school reading habits. Reading Improvement, 44(3): 111–131.
Moyer, J.E. 2011. “Teens today don’t read books anymore”: a study of differences in comprehension and interest across formats. PhD thesis. University of Minnesota.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M. and Foy, P. 2007. PIRLS 2006 International Report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College. [Online]. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/PDF/PIRLS2006_international_report.pdf (23 May 2019).
National Endowment for the Arts. 2007. To read or not to read: a question of national consequence. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. [Online]. https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/ToRead.pdf (11 March 2014).
North West Development Corporation. 2019. Economic Data Report. Quarter 2 of 2019/2020. Research and Innovation. Potchefstroom: North West Development Corporation. [Online]. https://nwdc.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/NWDC_Economic_Data_Report_Qtr_2_2019-2020.pdf (24 May 2019).
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. and Leech, N.L. 2006. Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3): 474–498.
Paratore, J.R. and Dougherty, S. 2011. Home differences and reading difficulty: handbook of reading disability research. New York: Routledge.
Phasha, N., McClure, L. and Magano, D. 2012. The book and the banknote: reading for leisure amongst 10th grade learners in South Africa. Anthropologist,14(4): 319–326.
Pilgreen, J.L. 2000. The SSR handbook: how to organize and manage a sustained silent reading program. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Boynton/Cook.
Pretorius, E. and Ribbens, R. 2005. Reading in a disadvantaged high school: issues of accomplishment, assessment and accountability. South African Journal of Education, 25(3): 139–147.
Rabiee, F. 2004. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4): 655–660.
Ross, C.S. 2009. Reader on top: public libraries, pleasure reading, and models of reading. Library Trends, 57(4): 632–656.
Smith, N.L. 2009. A study of middle grade students’ reading interests, habits and achievement. PhD thesis. University of North Carolina.
Snyman, M. 2006. Die leesvoorkeure enleesgedrag van Afrikaanse kinders. Mousaion, 24(1): 145–79.
South African Book Development Council. 2007. Snapshots of the national survey into the reading and book reading behaviour of adult South Africans. Pretoria: Department of Arts and Culture.
Statistics South Africa. 2011. Provincial profile: North-West census 2011. [Online]. http://www.statssa.gov.za (23 November 2019).
Strommen, L.T. and Mates, B.F. 2004. Learning to love reading: interviews with older children and teens. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(3): 188–200.
Tella, A. and Akande, S. 2007. Children’s reading habits and availability of books in Botswana primary schools: implications for achieving quality education. The Reading Matrix, 7(2): 117–142.
Tiemensma, L. 2009. The literacy environment in support of voluntary reading: a case study in Gauteng east and the Highveld ridge. Master’s thesis. University of South Africa.
Torgesen, J.K. 2002. The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1): 7–26.
Wasik, B.A., Bond, M.A. and Hindman, A. 2006. The effects of a language and literacy intervention on Head Start children and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1): 63–74.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors (copyright owners) should be properly acknowledged when works are cited. Authors retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of Open Access.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
