Embedded librarianship and Blackboard usage to manage knowledge and support blended learning at a South African university of technology
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate how Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT) Libraries can contribute to knowledge management processes using the Learning Management System, Blackboard, by embedding the librarian in the learning environment to support blended learning. Structured interviews were conducted at CPUT with eight lecturers involved in the Extended Curriculum Programme (ECP) in Faculty A and with one Faculty A librarian. One of the main findings indicated that lecturers use various teaching methods to support ECP students. Knowledge sharing between lecturers and the librarian mainly takes place during meetings and via email, but not via Blackboard. Training on Blackboard and current awareness of features such as Blackboard Collaborate are needed. Departments within Faculty A considered working together with the faculty librarian to support ECP students essential; they found it beneficial, important and very useful. Departments perceived Blackboard as a communication platform as well as a useful teaching tool. Both positive and negative experiences were shared about the use of Blackboard in the ECP. Although lecturers and the librarian thought that Blackboard improved student learning, both were aware of other means of reaching the students online such as Facebook or Google. Overall, there is a good working relationship between lecturers and the librarian with regard to supporting ECP students. It is therefore important that parties seeking collaboration should create an appropriate platform for interaction. One of the limitations of the study is that it excludes the student experience of using the online learning environment at CPUT. The study could inform CPUT Libraries and the university community regarding improving knowledge management practices.
Aharony, N. 2011. Librarians’ attitudes toward knowledge management. College & Research Libraries, 72 (2): 111-126.
Anderson, K. and May, F. 2010. Does the method of instruction matter? An experimental examination of IL instruction in the online, blended, and face-to-face classrooms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6): 495-500.
Asogwa,B.E., Ugwu, C.I. and Ugwuanyi, F.C. 2015. Evaluation of electronic service infrastructures and quality of e-services in Nigerian academic libraries. The Electronic Library, 33(6): 1133–1149.
Ball,S., Leonard, L., Littlejohn, A., Kelly, J., McAteer, E. McCulloh, M. and Peacock, S. 2012. Effective use of virtual learning environments. [Online]. http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/InfoKits/effective-use-of-VLEs (2 March 2012).
Barker, R. 2006. Homo machinus versus Homo sapiens: A knowledge management perspective of virtual communities in cyberspace. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 32(2): 226-240.
Bennett, O. and Gilbert, K. 2009. Extending liaison collaboration: partnering with faculty in support of a student learning community. Reference Services Review, 37(2): 131-142.
Besara, R. and Kinsley, K. 2011. Academic libraries – measuring up: assessment and collaboration for student success. New Library World, 112(9/10): 416-424.
Bhavnagri, N. P. and Bielat, V. 2005. Faculty-librarian collaboration to teach research skills: electronic symbiosis. The Reference Librarian, 43(89-90): 121-138.
Chipeta, G., Jacobs, D. and Mostert, J., 2009. Teaching and learning of IL in some selected institutions of higher learning in KwaZulu-Natal and Malawi. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 75(1): 46-57.
Clarence-Fincham, J., 2009. Developing an extended curriculum for humanities at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: conceptual shifts, challenges and constraints. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 7(3): 70-83.
Clark, V. and Creswell, J. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Comba, V. 2009. E-Tutorships and e-learning: re-skilling librarians for interactive communication in virtual environments. In Strategies for regenerating the library and information profession. J. Varlejs and G. Walton, Eds. Munich: Saur. [Online]. http://www.degruyter.com/dg/viewbooktoc.chapterlist.resultlinks.fullcontentlink:pdfeventlink/$002fbooks$002f9783598441776$002f9783598441776.5.279$002f9783598441776.5.279.pdf?t:ac=product/41985 (23 October 2014).
Coopman, S. 2009. A critical examination of Blackboard’s e-learning environment. First Monday, 14(6). [Online]. http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2434/2202 (18 July 2016).
Corrall, S. 2010. Educating the academic librarian as a blended professional: a review and case study. Library Management, 31(8/9): 567-593.
Costello, B., Lenholt, R. and Stryker, J., 2004. Using Blackboard in library instruction: addressing the learning styles of Generations X and Y. The Journal of Academic Librarianship., 30 (6): 452-460.
CPUT. 2008. Fundani: Extended curriculum programme: resources for Extended Curriculum Programme. [Online]. http://www.cput.ac.za/services/fundani/extended (3 March 2012).
CPUT. 2016a. Vision and Mission. [Online]. http://www.cput.ac.za/about/vision (19 July 2016).
CPUT. 2016b. About the Centre for e-Learning. [Online]. http://www.cput.ac.za/services/elearning (19 July 2016).
Crocker, A. 2006. Blended learning: a new approach to legal teaching in South African law schools. Journal for Juridical Science, 31(2): 1-25.
Garraway, J. 2009. Success of foundation (extended programmes) in Engineering and Sciences at CPUT. In Success stories in foundation / extended programmes. Higher Education Learning & Teaching Association of Southern Africa. [Online]. http://www.cput.ac.za/blogs/ecp/files/2015/02/Final_Success-Stories.pdf (18 July 2016).
Goh, A. 2005. Harnessing knowledge for innovation: an integrated management framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4): 6-18.
Hightower, B., Rawl, C. and Schutt, M., 2007. Collaborations for delivering the library to students through WebCT. Reference Services Review, 35 (4): 541-551.
Hoffman, S. 2011. Embedded academic librarian experiences in online courses: roles, faculty collaboration, and opinion. Library Management, 32(6/7): 444-456.
Jain, P. 2007. An empirical study of knowledge management in academic libraries in East and Southern Africa. Library Review, 56 (5): 377-392.
Kille, A. 2006. Wikis in the workplace: how wikis can help manage knowledge in library reference services. Libres, 16(1): 89-108.
Kleinveldt, L. 2015. The role of the embedded librarian using Blackboard as a knowledge management tool to support blended learning at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT) Libraries. Master’s thesis. University of Pretoria.
Knight, N. 2013. Enhancing access to library resources at Northern Caribbean University through an e-library initiative. The Electronic Library, 31(6): 753-769.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, S. 2003. Six factors to consider when planning online distance learning programs in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(1): 1-19.
Liu, K., Chang, C. and Hu, I., 2010. Exploring the effects of task characteristics on knowledge sharing in libraries. Library Review, 59 (6): 455-468.
Maponya, P. 2005. Fostering the culture of knowledge sharing in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19(5): 900-911.
Massis, B. 2012. Librarians and faculty collaboration-partners in student success. New Library World, 113(1/2): 90-93.
Mavodza, J. 2011. The academic librarian and the academe. New Library World, 112 (9/10): 446-451.
Mavodza, J. and Ngulube, P. 2012. Knowledge management practices at an institution of higher learning. South African Journal of Information Management, 14(1): 1-8.
Menkhoff, T., Thang, T.Y., Chay, Y.W. and Wong, Y.K. 2011. Engaging knowledge management learners through web-based ICT: an empirical study. VINE, 41(2): 132-151.
Moll, M. and Kleinveldt, L. 2008. The Mahout on the elephant: how the knowledge management practices of the Wellington Campus Library enriches CPUT Libraries. Library Papers and Reports. [Online]. http://works.bepress.com/michiel_moll/9/ (23 October 2014).
Naidoo, S. and Raju, J., 2012. Impact of the digital divide on IL training in a higher education context. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 78(1): 34-44.
Ngulube, P., 2005. Improving the quality of research outputs in higher education through knowledge sharing and collaboration: a case study. Mousaion, 23(1): 39-61.
Nielsen, D. and McCabe, K. 2012. Embedded librarian: enhancing student education through collaboration. British Columbia Library Association Browser: Linking the Library Landscape, 4(2) [Online]. http://bclabrowser.ca/bcla2/index.php/browser/article/viewArticle/384 (23 October 2014).
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oakleaf, M., Millet, M. and Kraus, L. 2011. All together now: getting faculty, administrators, and staff engaged in IL assessment. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3): 831-852.
Rafaeli, S., Barak, M., Dan-Gur,Y. and Toch, E. 2004. QSIA – a Web-based environment for learning, assessing and knowledge sharing in communities. Computers and Education, 43: 273-289
Sandrock, J. 2011. Art of KM CoP clustering exercise. [Online video]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pye7VvL4CoI (13 April 2016).
Shen, L., 2012. Improving the effectiveness of librarian-faculty collaboration. Collaborative Librarianship, 4(1):14-22.
Shepley, S. 2009. Building a virtual campus: librarians as collaborators in online course development and learning. Journal of Library Administration, 49(1-2): 89-95.
Si, L., Xing, W., Zhou, L. and Liu, S. 2012. Embedded services in Chinese academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(3): 175-182.
Silverman, D. 2011. Qualitative research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
Tee, M. and Karney, D., 2010. Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an online learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4): 385-413.
Tenkasi, R. and Boland, R.J. 1996. Exploring knowledge diversity in knowledge intensive firms: a new role for information systems. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(1): 79-91.
The University of North Carolina. 2010. Distance education services: embedded librarian. [Online]. http://library.uncg.edu/info/distance_education/embedded_librarian.aspx (4 August 2012).
Thomas, D. and Saib, M. 2013. Collaboration between academics and librarians: the case of the Durban University of Technology. Proceedings of the 34th International Association of Scientific and Technogical University Libraries (IATUL) Conference. 15-18 April 2013. Cape Town, South Africa. [Online]. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2013/papers/40/ (23 October 2014).
Tu, C. 2002. The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-learning, 1(2): 34-45.
Veal, R. and Bennett, E. 2009. The virtual library liaison: a case study at an online university. Journal of Library Administration, 49(1-2): 161-170.
Xiao, J. 2010. Integrating IL into Blackboard: librarian-faculty collaboration for successful student learning. Library Management, 31(8/9): 654-668.
Yen, C. H., Chen, I. C., Lai, Su. C., and Chuang, Y. R. 2015. An analytics-based approach to managing cognitive load by using log data of Learning Management Systems and Footprints of social media. Educational Technology and Society, 18 (4), 141–158.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors (copyright owners) should be properly acknowledged when works are cited. Authors retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of Open Access.