Assessing the appropriation of social media by academic librarians in South Africa and Zimbabwe
AbstractResearch into the appropriation of social media by academic libraries in countries with growing economies is scarce. There remains an empirical and theoretical gap in the literature about how librarians, particularly those in Southern Africa, are deploying social media in their work routines and in their personal lives. Based on one of the researchers’ experiences at the National University of Science and Technology (NUST) Library and both researchers’ use of the University of the Western Cape (UWC) Library, the researchers aimed to examine the way librarians deploy and appropriate social media platforms as part of their service delivery. Using data derived from a questionnaire survey among librarians at UWC in South Africa and NUST in Zimbabwe, this study examined how librarians use social media for professional and personal purposes. The findings suggest that UWC librarians are more proficient social media users than NUST librarians. They further reveal that UWC librarians themselves are managing social media, while at NUST, the Information Technology department is directly responsible for managing the platforms. The study found that UWC Library utilises social media to promote its services more widely, whereas the NUST Library uses social media for reference services.
Aharony, N. 2009. Web 2.0 use by librarians. Library and Information Science Research, 31 (1): 29-37.
Aharony, N. 2013. Factors affecting the adoption of Facebook by information professionals. [Online].
https://www.asis.org/asist2013/proceedings/submissions/.../8paper.pdf (20 August 2013).
Arif, M. and Mahmood, K. 2012. The changing role of librarians in the digital world: adoption of Web 2.0 technologies by Pakistani librarians. The Electronic Library, 30 (4): 469-479.
Banda, C. 2011. Use of social networking tools in libraries in Zambia. [Online]. http://justinchisenga.blogspot.com/2011/08/social-networking-tools-in-libraries-in.html (22 August 2013).
Baro, E.E., Ebiagbe, E.J. and Godfrey, V.Z. 2013. Web 2.0 tools usage: a comparative study of librarians in university libraries in Nigeria and South Africa. Library Hi Tech, 5 (1): 10-20.
Blank, G. and Reisdorf, B.C. 2012. The participatory Web. Information, Communication and Society, 15(4): 537-554.
Boxen, J. 2008. Library 2.0: a review of the literature. The Reference Librarian, 49 (1): 21- 34.
Charnigo, L. and Barnett-Ellis, P. 2007. Checking out Facebook.com: the impact of a digital trend on academic libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 26 (1): 23-34.
Chisenga, J. and Chande-Mallya, R. 2012. Social media and professional networking: a case of information professionals in the SCECSAL region. [Online]. http://scecsal.viel.co.ke/images/c/c0/Social_Media_and_Professional_Networking_A_Case_o f_Information_Professionals_in_the_SCECSAL_Region.pdf (25 September 2014).
Chitanana, L. 2012. Bandwidth management in universities in Zimbabwe: towards a responsible user base through effective policy implementation. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8 (2): 62-76.
Chu, S.K. and Du, H.S. 2013. Social networking tools for academic libraries. Journal of Library and Information Science, 45 (1): 64-75.
Cohen, H. 2012. 30 social media definitions. [Online].
http://heidicohen.com/social-media-definition/ (27 August 2014).
Collins, G. and Quan-Haase, A. 2012. Social media and academic libraries: current trends and future challenges. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/meet.14504901272/abstract (13 June 2013).
Ezeani, C. N. and Igwesi, U. 2012. Using social media for dynamic library services delivery: the Nigerian experience. [Online]. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/814 (15 June 2013).
Farkas, M. 2012. Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy. Library Hi Tech, 30 (1): 82-94.
Fernandez-Villavicencio, N.G. 2010.Helping students become literate in a digital, networking based society: a literature review and discussion. International Information and Library Review, 42 (1): 124-136.
Gauntner Witte, G. 2014. Content generation and social network interaction within academic library Facebook pages. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 26 (2): 89-100.
Gerolimos, M. and Konsta, R. 2011. Services for academic libraries in the new era. The Magazine of Digital Library Research, 17 (8): 1-13.
Harinarayana, N. and Raju V. 2010. Web 2.0 features in university library web sites. The Electronic Library, 28 (3): 69-88.
Hosseini, E. and Hashempour, L. 2012. The status of librarians’ knowledge sharing by the usage of Web 2.0 tools: a case study of central libraries of Tabriz governmental universities. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 317: 128-137.
Johnson, C. and Burclaff, N. 2013. Making social media meaningful: connecting missions and policies. [Online]. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/201 3/papers/JohnsonBurclaff_Making.pdf (25 March 2014).
Kibugi, S. 2013. The use of social media in the dissemination of information in selected public and private university libraries in Kenya. Innovation, 47 (1): 101-120.
Kim, Y. and Abbas, J. 2010. Adoption of Library 2.0 functionalities by academic libraries and users: a knowledge management perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36 (3): 211-218.
Kooy, B.K. and Steiner, S. K. 2010. Protection, not barriers: using social software policies to guide and safeguard students and employees. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 50 (1): 59-71.
Kwanya, T., Stilwell, C., and Underwood, P.G. 2012. Techno-stress and techno-lust: coping mechanisms among academic librarians in Eastern and Southern Africa. [Online]. www.globdev.org/files/ICTM2012_Proceedings.pdf (22 August 2014).
Luo, L. 2009. Web 2.0 integration in information literacy instruction: an overview. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36 (1): 32-40.
Mahmood, K. 2011. Impact of Web 2.0 technologies on US academic libraries: a study of ARL libraries. Lahore: University of the Punjab, PhD thesis.
Makori, E. O. 2011. Bridging the information gap with the patrons in university libraries in Africa: the case for investments in Web 2.0 systems. Library Review, 61 (4): 340-350.
Moran, B.B. and Leonard, E. 2009. Academic Librarianship. In: Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Sciences. (3rd ed.) New York: Taylor Francis, 1–10.
Munatsi, R. 2010. Implementation of library 2.0 services in African academic and research libraries: need for fundamental rethink. [Online].
http://www.scecsal.org/conferences/2010/spapers2010.pdf (15 June 2013).
National University of Science and Technology Library. 2014. [Online]. http://library.nust.ac.zw/ (20 September 2014).
Nfila, R. B. 2010. Academic libraries support for e-learning: initiatives and opportunities the case of University of Botswana Library. [Online] http://www.ais.up.ac.za/digi/docs/nfila_paper.pdf (8 June 2013).
Olasina, G. 2011. The use of Web 2.0 tools and social networking sites by librarians, information professionals, and other professionals in the workplaces in Nigeria. PNLA Quarterly, 75 (3): 11-39.
O’Leary, Z. 2004. The essential guide to research. London: Sage publications.
Oosman, A., McMillan, J. and Bell, J. 2014. Use of social media by library the library: current practices and future opportunities. [Online].
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/access/white-paper-social-media.pdf (5 January 2014).
Penzhorn, C. 2013. The use of social media in teaching a campus-wide information literacy course. Mousaion, 31 (3): 57-73.
Penzhorn, C. and Pienaar, H. 2009. The use of social networking tools for innovative delivery at the University of Pretoria library. Innovation, 36 (1): 66-77.
Rogers, C.R. 2009. Social media, libraries and Web 2.0: how American libraries are using new tools for public relations and to attract new users. [Online].
http://dc.statelibrary.sc.gov/bitstream/handle/10827/7271/SCSL_Social_Media_Libraries2011.pdf?sequence=1 (26 August 2013).
Sarrafzadeh, M., Hazeri A. and Alavi, S. 2011. The status of Web 2.0 in Iran’s LIS education. Education for Information, 28 (2): 233-245.
Sekyere, K. 2009. Too much hullabaloo about Facebook in Libraries: is it really helping libraries? Nebraska Library Association Quarterly, 40 (2): 25-37.
Si, L., Shi, R. and Chen, B. 2011. An investigation and analysis of the application of Web 2.0 in Chinese university libraries. The Electronic Library, 29 (5): 651-668.
Spacey, R., Goulding, A. and Murray, I. 2004. Exploring the attitudes of the public library staff to the Internet using the TAM. Journal of Documentation, 60 (5): 550-564.
Stephens, M. 2006. Exploring Web 2.0 and libraries. Library Technology Reports, 42 (6): 8-14.
Thanuskodi, S. 2012. Awareness of library 2.0 applications among library and information science professionals at Annamalai University, India. International Journal of Library Science, 1 (5): 75-83.
Tripathi, M. and Kumar, S. 2010. Use of Web 2.0 tools in academic libraries: reconnaissance of the international landscape. The International Information and Library Review, 42 (3): 195-207.
Trubitt, L. and Overholtzer, J. 2009. Good communication: the other social network for successful IT organizations. EDUCAUSE Review, 44 (6): 90-98.
University of the Western Cape Library. 2014. [Online]. http://lib.uwc.ac.za/ (20 September 2014).
Van Rooyen, A. 2012. Student experiences of technology integration at UNISA. Progressio, 1 (1): 1-7.
Vanwynsberghe, H., Vanderlinde, R., Georges, A. and Verdegem, P. 2015. The librarian 2.0: identifying a typology of librarians' social media literacy. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 47(4): 283-293.
Vermeulen, J. 2013. WhatsApp vs BBM vs MXit vs 2go in South Africa. [Online]. http://mybroadband.co.za/news/internet/86783-whatsapp-vs-bbm-vs-mxit-vs-2go-in- south-africa.html (21 August 2014).
World Wide Worx. 2014. South African Social Media Landscape 2014. [Online].
http://www.worldwideworx.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Exec-Summary-Social- Media-2014.pdf (11 November 2014).
Xu, C., Ouyang, F. and Chu, H. 2009. The academic library meets Web 2.0: applications and implications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35 (4): 324-331.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors (copyright owners) should be properly acknowledged when works are cited. Authors retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of Open Access.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License