Measuring the application of information literacy skills after completion of a Certificate in Information Literacy
AbstractThe current assessment method used by the Cape Peninsula University of Technology Libraries for the summative assessment of the short course, Certificate in Information Literacy (CIL), is by multiple-choice questions through the Learning Management System, Blackboard. Students also complete a pre-essay and pre-test before the training intervention and a post-essay and post-test thereafter. This research reports on how students applied their newly-taught Information Literacy (IL) skills when writing a subject-specific essay (post-essay) and how that related to their scores in the pre-essay/test and post-test. The sample of forty-two students consisted of two groups of first-year students from a single class. In this study it has been confirmed that offering a short course in IL, such as the CIL, improved the information literacy skills of students. It showed improvement in the knowledge gained by students in the multiple-choice assessment as well as the application of IL skills in their essay assignments.
Belanger, J., Zou, N., Mills, J., Holmes, C. and Oakleaf, M. 2015. Project RAILS: lessons learned about rubric assessment of information literacy skills. Libraries and the academy, 15(4): 623–644.
Berendt, L. and Otero-Boisvert, M. 2012. Future-proofing the academic librarian. In Defending professionalism: a resource for librarians, information specialists, knowledge managers, and archivists. B. Crowley, Ed. Santa Barbara: CA: Libraries Unlimited: 75–90.
Cape Peninsula University of Technology. 2015. Extended curriculum. [Online]. http://www.cput.ac.za/services/fundani/extended (13 May 2015).
Cook, D.B. and Michael, K. 2015. How do our students learn ? An outline of a cognitive psychological model for information literacy instruction. Reference, 55(1): 34–41.
Cramer, D. and Howitt, D. 2004. t test for related samples. The SAGE dictionary of statistics. [Online]. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-sage-dictionary-of-statistics/SAGE.xml.
Daugherty, A.L. and Russo, M.F. 2011. An assessment of the lasting effects of a stand-alone information literacy course: the students’ perspective. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(4): 319–326. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133311000747 (16 May 2014).
Dubicki, E. 2013. Faculty perceptions of students’ information literacy skills competencies. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(2): 97–125.
Field, A. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS: (and sex and drugs and rock n roll). London: Sage.
Grafstein, A. 2002. A discipline-based approach to information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(4): 197–204. [Online]. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0099133302002835.
Gullikson, S. 2006. Faculty perceptions of ACRL’s information literacy competency standards for higher education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(6): 583–592. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133306001054 (16 May 2014).
Hoffman, D. and LaBonte, K. 2012. Meeting information literacy outcomes: partnering with faculty to create effective information literacy assessment. Journal of information Literacy, 6(2): 70–85.
Hurst, S. and Leonard, J. 2007. Garbage in, garbage out: the effect of library instruction on the quality of students’ term papers. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 8(1).
Kremelberg, D. 2011. Practical statistics: a quick and easy guide to IBM and SPSS statistics, STATA, and other statistical software. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishers.
Lappalainen, J. and Rosqvist, J. 2014. Exploring hurdles to transfer: student experiences of applying knowledge across disciplines. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(3): 404–419. [Online]. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0020739X.2014.982729.
Lindauer, B.G. 2004. The three arenas of information literacy assessment. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 44(2): 122–129.
Lockhart, J. 2015. Increasing library value for users by registering a short course in information literacy. Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences. 5 - 9 July 2015. German National Library of Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany: Purdue. Paper 7. [Online]. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2092&context=iatul.
Lockhart, J. 2014. Using item analysis to evaluate the validity and reliability of an existing online information literacy skills assessment instrument. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 80(2): 36–45.
MacAyeal, G. 2014. A culture of assessment: five mindsets. College & Research Libraries: 311–312.
Nunnally, J. 1972. Educational measurement and evaluation. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oakleaf, M. 2008. Dangers and opportunities: a conceptual map of information literacy assessment approaches. Libraries and the Academy, 8(3): 233–253.
Oakleaf, M. 2010. Value of academic libraries: a comprehensive research review and report. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
Perkins, D.N. 1986. Thinking frames. Educational leadership, 43(8): 4–10.
Race, P. 2015. The lecturer’s toolkit: a practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
Saunders, L. 2012. Faculty perspectives on information literacy as a student learning outcome. The Journal Of Academic Librarianship, 38(4): 226–236.
Selegean, J., Thomas, M. and Richman, M. 1983. Long-range effectiveness of library use instruction. College & Research Libraries: 476–480. [Online]. http://crl.acrl.org/content/44/6/476.full.pdf.
Singh, A.B. 2005. A report on faculty perceptions of students’ information literacy competencies in journalism and mass communication programs: the ACEJMC survey. College & Research Libraries, 66(4): 294–310.
Staley, D.J. and Malenfant, K.J. 2010. Futures thinking for academic librarians: higher education in 2025. Information Services & Use, 30: 57–90.
Stevens, D. and Levi, A. 2005. Introduction to rubrics. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.
Walsh, A. 2009. Information literacy assessment: where do we start? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 41(1): 19–28.
Wang, R. 2006. The lasting impact of a library credit course. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(1): 79–92.
Werking, R.H. 1980. Evaluating bibliographic education : a review and critique. Library Trends, 29(1): 153–173.
Wong, G.K.W. 2010. Facilitating students’ intellectual growth in information literacy teaching. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(2): 114–118.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors (copyright owners) should be properly acknowledged when works are cited. Authors retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of Open Access.