Conceptualisation and Practice of Research Support: A Proposed Model for Effective Research Support in Zimbabwean University Libraries
Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a study that was carried out to establish the relationship between conceptualisation and practice of research support in Zimbabwean university libraries. Librarians in Zimbabwean university libraries were seemly invisible in the research orbit. Their ineffectiveness in practice was thought to be intrinsic to the understanding of research support since there has been a call to reconceptualise the concept. To understand the relationship, the study used the Theory of Action as its theoretical lens. Eight university libraries were examined and a meta-analysis of findings using the constant comparison method was conducted. Meta-claims were contrived from the eight group studies and this facilitated the juxtaposition of the two variables. Major congruence and incongruence were found from the constant comparison of meta-claims. It was concluded that incongruence in areas such as services, staff deployment, collaboration, and training contributed to the ineffectiveness of librarians in support of researchers. And these incongruences were caused by, inter alia, poor funding, lack of infrastructure, shortage of staff, lack of management support and an enabling policy. Resultantly, a model for effective research support for academic libraries in Zimbabwe was developed.References
Argyris, C.1980. Inner contradictions of rigorous research. New York: Academic Press.
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. 1974. Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. 1978. Organizational learning. a theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison Wesley.
Corrall, S., Kennan, M. A., & Afzal, W. 2013. Bibliometrics and research data management Services: Emerging Trends in Library Support for Research. Library Trends, 61(3): 636-674. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2013.0005 (16 February 2016).
Dermol, V. 2012. Relationship between mission statements and company performance scientific annals of the “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”. University of Iaşi Economic Sciences, 59(1): 321-336. [Online]. https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/aicue.2012.59.issue-1/v10316-012-0022-9/v10316-012-0022-9.pdf (11 May 2016).
Du Mont, R.R. and Du Mont, P.F. 1981. Assessing the effectiveness of library service. Occasional Papers, 152: 1-24. Unversity of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science. [Online]. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/3830/gslisoccasionalpv00000i00152.pdf?sequence=1 (11 June 2015).
Ellis, E. L., Rosenblum, B., Stratton, J. and Ames-Stratton, K. 2014. Positioning academic libraries for the future: a process and strategy for organisational transformation. (Online). http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/14141/IATUL_Positioning_Academic_Libraries_For_The_Future.pdf?sequence=1 (19 May 2015).
Ford, E. and Zeigen, L. 2013. Interinstitutional library collaboration: support for a joint Master of Public Health program. Library faculty publications and presentations. Paper 133. [Online]. http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/ulib_fac/133 (22 January 2016).
Frances, M., Fletcher J. and Harmer, S. 2011. Reshaping and rescoping university libraries to fit changing academic requirements. Paper presented at IATUL 2011, Warsaw, Poland, May 29-June 2. [Online].
http://www.bg.pw.edu.pl/iatul2011/proceedings/ft/Frances_M.pdf (10 May 2015).
Ganu, J. 2013. Institutional mission statements and attitudinal outcomes of selected faith based tertiary institutions in Ghana. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 14(2): 20-30. [Online]. http://www.na-businesspress.com/JABE/GanuJ_Web14_2_.pdf (10 January 2016).
Hessels, L. K. and Lente, H. 2007. Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda. Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) Working Paper Series. [Online]. www.geo.uu.nl/isu/pdf/isu0803.pd (05 May 2015).
Kerr, P. A. 2010. Conceptions and practice of information literacy in academic libraries: espoused theories and theory –in-use. Maters Dissertation. The State University of New Jersey. Graduate School, New Brunswick Rutgers. [Online]. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/27317/ (11 May 2015).
Machimbidza, A. 2014. National University of Science and Technology (NUST) academics’ attitudes towards NUST Institutional Repositories (NUSPACE). MSc (Library Information Science). Bulawayo: National University of science and Technology.
Mazhude, A., 2015. Use of the University of Zimbabwe research commons by undergraduate students. MSc (Library and Information Science) dissertation. National University of Science and Technology. Bulawayo.
Meacham, J., and J. G. Gaff. 2006. Learning goals in mission statements: Implications for educational leadership. Liberal Education, 92(1): 613.
Monroe-Gulick, A., O’Brien, M.S. and White, G.W. 2013. Librarians as partners: moving from research supporters to research partners. Association of College and Research Libraries Conference Proceedings, 10-13 April. Indianapolis, Indiana: Association of College and Research Libraries. [Online]. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2013/papers/GulickOBrienWhite_Librarians.pdf (8 January 21 2016).
Namuleme, R. K. and Kanzira, A. N. 2015. Research support services in academic libraries in Uganda: challenges and opportunities. In Raju, R., Adam, A., Johnson, G., Miller, C. and Pietersen, J. (eds). The quest for deeper meaning of research support, (29-40). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Libraries. [Online]. http://srvubulbw001.uct.ac.za/omp/index.php/uctlibraries/index (16 January 2016).
Parker, R. 2012. What the library did next: strengthening our visibility in research support. empowering futures. VALA 2012 16th Biennial Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 6-9 February. [Online]. http://www.vala.org.au/vala2012-proceedings (23 May 2015).
Pasipamire, N. 2015. Research support by subject librarians in selected state university libraries in Zimbabwe: accommodating new trends. In Raju, R., Adam, A., Johnson, G., Miller, C. and Pietersen, J. (eds). The quest for deeper meaning of research support, (62-80). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Libraries. [Online]. http://srvubulbw001.uct.ac.za/omp/index.php/uctlibraries/index (16 January 2016).
Raju, R. and Schoombee, L. 2013. Research sup-port through the lens of transformation in academic libraries with reference to the case of Stellenbosch University Libraries. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 79(2): 27-38. [Online]. http://sajlis.jour-nals.ac.za/pub/article/view/155/1304 (10 May 2015).
Raju, R. and Schoombee, L. 2014. Research support through the lens of transformation in academic libraries with reference to the case of Stellenbosch University Libraries. [Online]. http://www.slideshare.net/luciaschoombee/research-support-through-the-lens-of-transformation-sajlis-2014 (10 May 2015).
Schön, D. A. 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schreiber, R., Crooks, D. and Stern, P. N. 1997. Qualitative meta-analysis in Morse J. M, (ed) Completing a qualitative project details and dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Smith, M., Heady, R. B., Carson, P. P., & Carson, K. D. (2003). Do missions accomplish their missions? An exploratory analysis of mission statement content and organizational longevity. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 6(1): 75–96.
Stafsudd, A. and Collin, S. 1999. Recruitment policy vs. recruitment process espoused theory and theory-in-use. Presented at the EGOS Conference at Warwick, 1999. [Online]. http://www.svencollin.se/anna1999.pdf (11 June 2015).
Tise, E. R. 2015. From research support to research partners. IFLA ARL Satellite Meeting 13-14 August 2015, Cape Town.
Willis, D. 1993. Learning and assessment: exposing the inconsistencies of theory and practice. Oxford Review of Education, (19): 383-402.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors (copyright owners) should be properly acknowledged when works are cited. Authors retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of Open Access.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
