Towards bridging the digital divide in post-apartheid South Africa: a case of a historically disadvantaged university in Cape Town
Abstract
South Africa’s historically disadvantaged university libraries are, like others, challenged to meet patrons’ demands through the provision of relevant infrastructure, services and information-related skills to enable users to function in the digital information age. Their historic disadvantage is compounded by two levels of the digital divide: their situation within a developing nation (the ‘global divide’), and contending with a relative paucity in skills and resources within this context (the ‘local divide’, as a legacy of apartheid). This paper reports on a master’s study undertaken to explore whether the electronic services initiated in post-apartheid South Africa by University of the Western Cape (UWC) Library are perceived by primary stakeholders (users and library staff) as effective in bridging the digital divide. The study employed a phenomenological qualitative design, supported by critical theory. Purposive sampling was used to select two sets of samples for data collection: postgraduate students and UWC librarians. Data was collected from forty students through an online questionnaire, and interviews were held with six UWC librarians. Findings suggest that the UWC Library has emerged as a competent agent of democracy: most of the users perceive the e-services being offered as useful and meeting their needs, and the library currently provides ICT infrastructure, internet access and information-related skills programmes to support the university community. However, challenges encountered include slow internet connection, security concerns, shortcomings in information literacy, problems of access and accessibility (including language), and reluctance to engage with unfamiliar technology. While the institution does make an effort to bridge the digital divide, recommended further research, such as evaluating the impact of slow internet speed on research and learning or enhanced interventions in information literacy, could further support more equitable access to information.References
Bornman, A. 2016. Information society and digital divide in South Africa: results of longitudinal surveys. Information, Communication & Society. 19(2): 264-278. DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1065285.
Brooks, S., Donovan, P. and Rumble, C. 2005. Developing nations, the digital divide and research databases. Serials Review. 31(4): 270-278. DOI:10.1016/j.serrev.2005.09.002.
Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Creswell, J. 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Daniels, D., Darch, C. and de Jager, K. 2010. The research commons: a new creature in the library? Performance Measurement and Metrics. 11(2): 116-130. DOI:10.1108/14678041011064043.
Department of Higher Education. 1997. Education White Paper 3: a programme for the transformation of higher education. Government Gazette. 386(18207):10. [Online]. http://www.education.gov.za/Resources/Legislation/WhitePapers.aspx (2 February 2014).
Donoghue, A. 2008. South Africa compares digital divide to apartheid. ZDNet. 25 April. [Online]. http://www.zdnet.com/south-africa-compares-digital-divide-to-apartheid-3039405246/ (18 May 2014).
Flanagan, P. 2016. The digital divide: an inhibitor to integral human development. Journal of Catholic Social Thought. 13(2): 345-360. DOI:10.5840/jcathsoc201613212.
Fuchs, C. and Horak, E. 2008. Africa and the digital divide. Telematics and Informatics. 25(2): 99-116. DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2006.06.004.
Herselman, M. and Britton, K.G. 2002. Analysing the role of ICT in bridging the digital divide amongst learners. South African Journal of Education. 22(4): 270-274. [Online]. http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC31911 (20 July 2013).
Johnson, W.R. 1982. Education: keystone of apartheid. Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 13(3): 214-237. DOI:10.1525/aeq.1982.13.3.05x0983u.
Kincheloe, J.L. 2000. Cultural studies and democratically aware teacher education: post-Fordism, civics and the worker citizen. In Democratic social education: social studies for social change. D. W. Hursh and E. Wayne Ross, Eds. New York: Falmer Press. 97-106.
Kolikant, Y.B.D. 2010. Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior. 26(6): 1384-1391. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.012.
Luaran, J.E., Nadzri, F.A., Rom, K.B.M. and Jain, J. 2016. The importance of Information and Communication Technology in English learning: indigenous students' perspectives. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education. 18(1): 87-101. DOI:10.21315/mjde2016.18.1.6.
Mabokela, R. O. and King, K. L. Eds. 2001. Apartheid no more: case studies of Southern African universities in the process of transformation. London: Bergin & Gavery.
Naidoo, S. and Raju, J. 2012. Impact of the digital divide on information literacy training in a higher education context. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. 78(1): 34-44. [Online]. http://sajlis.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/46/39 (2 December 2013).
Naidoo, V. 2012. Technology in the classroom: bridging the digital divide. The skills portal. 3 August. [Online]. https://www.skillsportal.co.za/content/bridging-digital-divide (19 June 2014).
Naslund, J. and Giustini, D. 2008. Towards school library 2.0: an introduction to social software tools for teacher-librarians. School Libraries Worldwide. 14(2): 55-67. DOI:10.14288/1.0077916.
Ng’ambi, D., Brown, C., Bozalek, V., Gachago, D. and Wood, D. 2016. Technology enhanced teaching and learning in South African higher education: a rearview of a 20 year journey. British Journal of Educational Technology. 47(5): 843-858. DOI:10.1111/bjet.12485.
Oliver, M. 2011. Technological determinism in educational technology research: some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 27(5): 373-384. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x.
Pyati, A.K. 2007. Re-envisioning libraries in the information society: a critical theory of library technology. Ph.D. thesis. University of California.
Rivers, J.K., Rivers, P.A. and Hazell, V. 2015. Africa and technology in Higher Education: trends, challenges, and promise. International Educative Research Foundation and Publisher. 3(5). [Online]. http://ijier.net/index.php/ijier/article/view/354/273 (20 January 2016).
Robertson, H-J. 2003. Toward a theory of negativity: teacher education and information and communications technology. Journal of Teacher Education. 54(4): 280-296. DOI:10.1177/0022487103255499.
Sayed, Y. and Jansen, J.D. Eds. 2001. Implementing education policies: the South African experience. Cape Town: UCT Press.
Sehoole, M.T.C. 2005. Democratizing higher education policy: constraints of reform in post-apartheid South Africa. New York: Routledge.
Singh, A.M. 2004. Bridging the digital divide: the role of universities in getting South Africa closer to the global information society. South African Journal of Information Management. 6(2). [Online]. http://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA1560683X_363 (3 December 2014).
Tapfumaneyi, K.D. and Rupande, G. 2013. The challenges of establishing digital library services in an Open and Distance Learning (ODL) environment and the potential benefits: the road towards the integration of digital and traditional library services: the case of Zimbabwe Open University (ZOU). International Journal of Advanced Research. 1(5): 519-526. [Online]. http://www.journalijar.com/uploads/2013-08-01_033517_526.pdf (4 January 2015).
Thinyane, H. 2010. Are digital natives a world-wide phenomenon? An investigation into South African first year students’ use and experience with technology. Computers & Education. 55(1): 406-414. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.005.
Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B. and Gray, K. 2010. Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education. 54(4): 1202-1211. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.006.
World Bank. 2016. South Africa Overview. [Updated 4 October 2016]. [Online]. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/southafrica/overview (26 October 2016).
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors (copyright owners) should be properly acknowledged when works are cited. Authors retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of Open Access.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
